This opinion paper by Gideon Mumba explores why Loss and Damage finance continues to feel like a myth for developing countries like Zambia. Drawing on lived realities of floods, droughts, and growing debt burdens, it questions the gap between global climate finance pledges and tangible support on the ground. The paper calls for accessible, grant-based funding and greater accountability to ensure climate justice reaches frontline communities.
Loss and Damage Framework Model: Decisions Review
This document provides a detailed background about the formative decisions that led to the establishment and full operationalisation of the loss and damage mechanism under the UNFCCC. The “UNFCCC Loss and Damage Mechanism Decision Review” document informs and contributes to the loss and damage framework. This paper dives into the decision processes, meetings and conferences that led to the establishment of the Loss and Damage (L&D), including the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) for responding to L&D, the Santiago Network on Loss and Damage (SNLD) and the Fund For Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD). It also accounts for decisions taken since the inception of the L&D mechanism up to COP30, like the WIM reviews, Conference of Parties (CP), and Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC. The positionality of this document is dependent on the perspective and text of the authors.